I have read a lot of different views and they all boil down to the same thing: God did both give and receive the medium for sacrifice (Jesus) but believing that is not right, God did it out of love and you should just accept it.
The question remains: Why is God credited with being both the giver and receiver of the atonement sacrifice, it doesn't make sense to give to yourself while letting others suffer at your hands. Another question that flows from it: Why was the atonement necessary? Or was the atonement paid to somebody else (which would make more sense) but then to whom.
Our parents sinned and as their punishment they died thus completing their punishment. However we are being punished for their error as well which we can't change thus the punisher provided a symbolic receiver of the penalty but chose not to receive it right then and there but wait a little over 2000 years and let countless others suffer?
If the above makes sense to you, please explain it to me. For me it's easier to believe that this is all hogwash unless somebody can explain the reasoning behind it. It would be much more acceptable if this God-person was a duality of both Good and Evil and the Good paid the Evil.